« HP and Microsoft team up for improved communications and collaboration | Main | Riverbed customer, Dudek, avoids unnecessary server deployment »

May 19, 2009

WAN optimization slugfest

David Spark reporting for Riverbed at Interop '09, Las Vegas, NV.

Riverbed was definitely on this panel debating the issue of WAN optimization with its competitors. Always great to put a bunch of competitors on a panel. The heated discussion always makes for an entertaining panel.

The moderator was Jim Metzler, Vice President, Ashton, Metzler & Associates. And the panelists were:
  • Apurva Dave, Senior Director of Product Marketing, Riverbed
  • Kenneth Salchow, Senior Technical Marketing Manager, F5
  • Mark Urban, Senior Director of Product Marketing, Blue Coat
  • Mark Weiner, Director, Data Center Solutions, Cisco
  • Peter Schmidt, CTO for North America, Ipanema
  • Satya Vardharajan, Senior Product Marketing Manager, Access and Acceleration Group, Citrix Systems, Inc.

Here are some of the issues brought up in the discussion:

(NOTE: the opinions are a mishmash from Riverbed and its five competitors. Please understand these opinions about WAN optimization are from many Riverbed.):

  • The packet delivery network is not set up to send applications efficiently.
  • You want to see all the applications on the network. You want to understand the nature of the problems first before you deploy WAN optimization.
  • All the vendors mentioned their differentiation. It was all over the map, but some of the issues mentioned were the need for higher levels of integration with elements like security, proven relationships, level of partnerships, speed, scalability, simplicity, manageability, delivery of virtual applications, and enforcing performance targets.
  • For virtual desktop, you need to optimize all aspects. For example, you'd want to make sure screen traffic on a virtual desktop gets higher priority.
  • For successful optimization of virtual desktops, be closely aligned with technology providers, such as VMware. Riverbed embeds VMware's services in its hardware.
  • For desktop virtualization, a mouse movement on a terminal is very different experience to manage in WAN optimization than just moving files.
  • You need to test these tools in your environment on your own applications. Examples of other's experiences only goes so far.
  • Need to look at all points on the entire network to optimize traffic.
  • Regarding the issue of Quality of Service (QoS) of traffic from the desktop to the app and back. You want to denote certain traffic that's more latency sensitive than other traffic that isn't traditionally latency sensitive. You allow that traffic that's normally latency sensitive to then take up space if there are problems.
  • Cascade, recently acquired by Riverbed, provides netflow aggregation. Works on sites you've optimized and you haven't optimized.
  • You need to guarantee the end user experience. Don't worry about traffic, worry about your users. Build a solution that connects to your SLA (service license agreement).
  • How to deal with QoS: Understand the critical applications and control recreation. If you have mission critical applications, you have to define them and protect them. You need to get to levels of granularity so things like a single voice call gets enough traffic.
  • Where is your QoS going to be? On the WAN or on the router? Overwhelming majority of people put QoS on the router, not on the WAN optimization device. Riverbed allows you to manage your QoS wherever you want.
  • The overwhelmingly majority of the audience don't have visibility end-to-end of what's going on their network nor do they have QoS at the end of their network.
  • Define Web applications through the URL. Web applications can be critical to your business.
  • Lot of talk about knowing about applications and be able to manage those applications for the best end user experience.
  • For SLA, use an app level monitoring tool to see where a problem lies. Is it on the server, WAN, somewhere else? 
  • Consider performance not by the network or the application, but rather what performance is for an individual user session.

For more, check out all of Riverbed's Interop '09 Las Vegas coverage.

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e5508a3ca7883401156f97465f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WAN optimization slugfest:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I think for virtual desktop, you need to optimize all aspects. For example, you'd want to make sure screen traffic on a virtual desktop gets higher priority.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.


WWW
blogs.riverbed.com

Please enter your email address to subscribe to the Riverbed Blog:

Please enter your email address to subscribe to the Riverbed Blog: